Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cafe Gloucester

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 12:54, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cafe Gloucester

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing to distinguish this Chinese restaurant from thousands of others. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 02:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No news mention, nothing to distibguish article from other non-notable restaurants. Not even a business website to be found. Article creator has completed no other edits; article may be self-promotion Rotovia (talk) 02:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable restaurant, suspected self-promotion. Also delete Image:OXwK5QmvcbwVPt-640m.jpg at conclusion. –ArmadniGeneral (talk • contribs) 07:19, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete delete per nom --KenWalker | Talk 15:35, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I've been watching this for a while too. Agree fully with nom. Shadowjams (talk) 01:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Couldn't find any WP:Reliable Sources. Most of the sources found were directory listings. - FaceMash (talk) 14:45, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.